I don't see quite the level of inconsistency in the first item that you do. If you're a political/media entity operating in a market where you believe the biggest social platform has serious security issues, it makes sense you would continue to use it to promote content while it remains so, while at the same time removing it from corporate devices with sensitive data, and/or supporting legislation that would ban it. Until the latter is successful it doesn't achieve anything to stop using it for broadcast - could even weaken your efforts
I don't see quite the level of inconsistency in the first item that you do. If you're a political/media entity operating in a market where you believe the biggest social platform has serious security issues, it makes sense you would continue to use it to promote content while it remains so, while at the same time removing it from corporate devices with sensitive data, and/or supporting legislation that would ban it. Until the latter is successful it doesn't achieve anything to stop using it for broadcast - could even weaken your efforts